<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First sale doctrine not a defense to tortious interference and civil conspiracy claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/08/15/first-sale-doctrine-not-a-defense-to-tortious-interference-and-civil-conspiracy-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/08/15/first-sale-doctrine-not-a-defense-to-tortious-interference-and-civil-conspiracy-claims/</link>
	<description>Covering law and the Internet since 2005.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	</channel>
</rss>
