<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Circuit affirms Dimeo v. Max &#8212; Section 230 immunity applies to forum board operator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/09/21/third-circuit-affirms-dimeo-v-max-section-230-immunity-applies-to-forum-board-operator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/09/21/third-circuit-affirms-dimeo-v-max-section-230-immunity-applies-to-forum-board-operator/</link>
	<description>Covering law and the Internet since 2005.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	</channel>
</rss>
