2 Comments

  1. Dave Zan

    Agreeing with Meadows’s interpretation of the section

    So my name isn't subject to trademark protection? Dayem. (just kidding, of course. :D)

    Well, at least the judge settled the question on 1125. I happen to also agree with it (despite not being a lawyer) since trademarks arise from use in commerce…whatever that means. 😛

  2. Marc J. Randazza

    Compare this case to Dawson v. Brandsberg, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73512, 13-7 (W.D. Va. 2006).

Comments are closed.

Did you enjoy this post? Then please share it with your friends and colleagues: