<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry and Twitter in a trademark tussle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/02/blackberry-and-twitter-in-a-trademark-tussle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/02/blackberry-and-twitter-in-a-trademark-tussle/</link>
	<description>Covering law and the Internet since 2005.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al@BlackberryReviews</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/02/blackberry-and-twitter-in-a-trademark-tussle/#comment-18566</link>
		<dc:creator>Al@BlackberryReviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=412#comment-18566</guid>
		<description>Evan,

I can not think of any unregistared marks, but was curious if you new of the outcome of this situation.  Did anything come of it over the last few months?  Did RIM oppose the application?  If so, I'm curious if we now know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan,</p>
<p>I can not think of any unregistared marks, but was curious if you new of the outcome of this situation.  Did anything come of it over the last few months?  Did RIM oppose the application?  If so, I&#8217;m curious if we now know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
