<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Shyftr and copyright infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description>Covering law and the internet since 2005.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:13:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Aue</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-8217</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Aue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=419#comment-8217</guid>
		<description>FYI, TechMacro.com (mentioned in related posts) now shows only excerpts of feeds. However we offer 2 options for readers:

1. Go to original post (we always give BIG link back)
2. Read the post directly in the site (in an IFRAME)

I personally think full feed is the best thing in blogsphere and that is one of good reasons why your blog has grown up so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, TechMacro.com (mentioned in related posts) now shows only excerpts of feeds. However we offer 2 options for readers:</p>
<p>1. Go to original post (we always give BIG link back)<br />
2. Read the post directly in the site (in an IFRAME)</p>
<p>I personally think full feed is the best thing in blogsphere and that is one of good reasons why your blog has grown up so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul Pop</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-8055</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=419#comment-8055</guid>
		<description>Evan, Shyftr may have changed its policy, but as you can see if you look at my feed on their site, all my posts are still displayed in full. Their policy &quot;change&quot;, is, as Eric said, &quot;smoke-and-mirrors&quot;. Here&#039;s the link to my feed on Shyftr: 

http://www.shyftr.com/?openagg=4157&amp;onlyagg=1

I should note that I&#039;ve asked them via email to remove my feed, gave them 48 hours, and they haven&#039;t replied. I&#039;m going to submit a DMCA take-down request either tonight or tomorrow morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan, Shyftr may have changed its policy, but as you can see if you look at my feed on their site, all my posts are still displayed in full. Their policy &#8220;change&#8221;, is, as Eric said, &#8220;smoke-and-mirrors&#8221;. Here&#8217;s the link to my feed on Shyftr: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.shyftr.com/?openagg=4157&amp;onlyagg=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.shyftr.com/?openagg=4157&amp;onlyagg=1</a></p>
<p>I should note that I&#8217;ve asked them via email to remove my feed, gave them 48 hours, and they haven&#8217;t replied. I&#8217;m going to submit a DMCA take-down request either tonight or tomorrow morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-8042</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=419#comment-8042</guid>
		<description>Great insight here, Evan. 

I&#039;m still troubled by what Shyftr is doing even after its recent policy change. Apparently full feeds will still be accessible in a &quot;read only&quot; area and then what comments are added a different page will appear that removes full text. This seems to be a little smoke-and-mirrors-ish to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insight here, Evan. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still troubled by what Shyftr is doing even after its recent policy change. Apparently full feeds will still be accessible in a &#8220;read only&#8221; area and then what comments are added a different page will appear that removes full text. This seems to be a little smoke-and-mirrors-ish to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-7985</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=419#comment-7985</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this very thoughtful and interesting post. Also, thank you very much for addressing the issue of the implied license. Your thoughts closely mirrors that of other attorneys I&#039;ve spoken with on it.

Still, until we get a solid ruling or two directly on the topic of RSS use, it seems some are going to take the implied license thing to an extreme.

Personally, I prefer to provide an actual one to my work, just to avoid any of those issues before they come up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this very thoughtful and interesting post. Also, thank you very much for addressing the issue of the implied license. Your thoughts closely mirrors that of other attorneys I&#8217;ve spoken with on it.</p>
<p>Still, until we get a solid ruling or two directly on the topic of RSS use, it seems some are going to take the implied license thing to an extreme.</p>
<p>Personally, I prefer to provide an actual one to my work, just to avoid any of those issues before they come up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/04/13/on-shyftr-and-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=419#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

Thanks for the great post.

I&#039;m glad a professional (lawyer) got the chance to weigh in on this discussion, which in some respects is an old one, but with services like Shyftr, become new again.

Cheers
tony hung @ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Thanks for the great post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad a professional (lawyer) got the chance to weigh in on this discussion, which in some respects is an old one, but with services like Shyftr, become new again.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
tony hung @ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
