<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court reconsiders &#8220;making available&#8221; in file-sharing case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/05/16/court-reconsiders-making-available-in-file-sharing-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/05/16/court-reconsiders-making-available-in-file-sharing-case/</link>
	<description>Covering law and the internet since 2005.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:05:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetcases.com/2008/05/16/court-reconsiders-making-available-in-file-sharing-case/comment-page-1/#comment-12560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=428#comment-12560</guid>
		<description>Little does Judge Davis know that the decision which he says has &quot;since&quot; been  vacated was actually vacated BEFORE the Capitol v. Thomas trial, and the RIAA lawyers &quot;forgot&quot; to tell him that. Boy will he be upset when he finds that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little does Judge Davis know that the decision which he says has &#8220;since&#8221; been  vacated was actually vacated BEFORE the Capitol v. Thomas trial, and the RIAA lawyers &#8220;forgot&#8221; to tell him that. Boy will he be upset when he finds that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
