1. dbltapp

    So what did the plaintiff get as a result? If the offenders aren’t sufficiently punished, where’s the motivation to not continue to violate the plaintiff’s civil rights?

  2. wms

    Considering the Appellate (US First district) decision GLIK v. CUNNIFFE It is surprising that this cop hasn’t gotten the message that photography is legal. further harassing photographers for taking photographs is not.

    • WMS – the incident in this case happened in 2007, and the Glik decision was from 2011. But I have read that the police department in this case has modified its procedures concerning the filming of police officers in response to changes in the law — I’m sure the Glik decision played a role in that.

Comments are closed.

Did you enjoy this post? Then please share it with your friends and colleagues: