1. These sort of things are exactly why people argue for one set of rules for each state. There are 50 states, which makes it difficult to know every law in every state, which for me, wastes a lot of court time, because we see many cases like this one. It would be much more cut and dry for everyone if we had one set of rules!

  2. It seems like a big fuss was made in this case, when really it should have been very simple. If the plaintiff admitted to reading the clause, then she should have known that she did not have a leg to stand on in court. She should have read the clause more carefully, it was obviously there for a reason.

Comments are closed.

Did you enjoy this post? Then please share it with your friends and colleagues: