Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc., 2010 WL 2712217 (9th Cir. July 9, 2010) Pleading in federal court is generally a straightforward matter. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 requires only that the plaintiff set forth a short and plain statement as to why that party is entitled to relief. But in cases involving fraud, there [...]
Archive for the ‘Spam’ Category
State law spam claim in federal court not pled with required particularity
July 13th, 2010
No Comments
Government spam blocking not a violation of First Amendment right to petition
November 6th, 2008
Comments Off
Ferrone v. Onorato, No. 07-4299, 2008 WL 4763257 (3rd Cir. October 31, 2008) The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a county government did not violate a citizen’s First Amendment right to petition the government for a redress of greivences when the county set its spam filters to block all email from the [...]
Court: Send spam to Washington state and you can be sued there
December 22nd, 2005
Comments Off
Leaving a thin slice: CAN-SPAM does not completely preempt Washington state law
July 14th, 2005
Comments Off
No spam with those potatoes: Idaho federal court tosses CAN-SPAM complaint
June 4th, 2005
Comments Off
